The Path of Power

Anna A. Proskurina, Institute for Research on Social Phenomena

Recommended Citation:
Proskurina, Anna A. (2016) ‘The Path of Power’, Social Phenomena. 2016 2(5), pp. 33-43.

Abstract
The continuity of power is studied in the paper from the point of view of material conditions of power production and existence. The mechanisms of continuity are determined through the analysis of functional properties of power taking into account the fundamental role of activity in the functioning of society. Continuity is seen as a necessary property of power based on inter-generational expectations and on the ability to meet these expectations. Expectation itself is understood as a special activity.

Keywords: power, continuity of power, path dependence, expectation, activity, heroism, generation.

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. On Violence. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1970.
  2. Auzan, Aleksandr A. “Path Dependence Problem: The Evolution of Approaches.” Moscow University Economics Bulletin. Series 6: Economics. 1 (2015): 3–17. (in Russian).
  3. Biryuk, O.L. Gusev, V.Yu. Kalinina, E.Yu. Slovar’ glagol’noy sochetaemosti nepredmetnykh imen russkogo yazyka. [Russian Language Dictionary of Noun-verb Collocations] 2008. 30 March 2016 <http://dict.ruslang.ru/abstr_noun.php>. (in Russian).
  4. Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz. “Two Faces of Power.” The American Political Science Review. 56.4 (1962): 947–52, doi:10.2307/1952796.
  5. David, Paul A. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” The American Economic Review. 75.2 (1985): 332–37.
  6. Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press, 1984.
  7. Loury, Glenn C. “Self-Censorship in Public Discourse: A Theory of ‘Political Correctness’ and Related Phenomena.” Rationality and Society. 6.4 (Oct. 1994): 428–61. doi:10.1177/1043463194006004002.
  8. Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
  9. Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. Politics among Nations. Knopf New York, 1950.
  10. Nechaev, Aleksey V. “ Wishes and Expectations: a Social Philosophic View.” Social Phenomena. 1 (3) (2015): 10–21. (In Russian)
  11. —. Ontologiya odinochestva: rassuzhdeniya o prirode chelovecheskogo odinochestva. [Ontology of Loneliness: Reflections about the Nature of Human Loneliness.] Samara: Samarskiy universitet, 2004. (in Russian).
  12. North, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge university press, 1990.
  13. Nye, Joseph S. “The Changing Nature of World Power.” Political Science Quarterly. 105.2 (1990): 177–92. doi:10.2307/2151022.
  14. “Ombudspersons for Future Generations: Bringing Intergenerational Justice into the Heart of Policymaking.” UN Chronicle: the Magazine of the United Nations, Vol. XLIX, Nо. 1 & 2 (June, 2012). http://unchronicle.un.org/article/ombudspersons-future-generations-bringingintergenerationaljustice-heart-policymaking/(last accessed 30 March 2016).
  15. Parsons, Talcott. “On the Concept of Political Power.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 107, no. 3, 1963, pp. 232–62.
  16. The Philippines: Right of Future Generations to a Healthy Environment. 30 March 2016 <http://www.futurepolicy.org/crimes/right-of-future-generations/>.
  17. Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Vol. 1, Univ of California Press, 1978.
  18. Well-Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. The National Archive.  30 March 2016 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/anaw/2015/2/contents/enacted>.

 

Открыть на весь экран